Search for: All records

Abstract The use of coarse resolution and strong grid‐scale dissipation has prevented global ocean models from simulating the correct kinetic energy level. Recently parameterizing energy backscatter has been proposed to energize the model simulations. Parameterizing backscatter reduces long‐standing North Atlantic sea surface temperature (SST) and associated surface current biases, but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Here, we apply backscatter in different geographic regions to distinguish the different physical processes at play. We show that an improved Gulf Stream path is due to backscatter acting north of the Grand Banks to maintain a strong deep western boundary current. An improved North Atlantic Current path is due to backscatter acting around the Flemish Cap, with likely an improved nearby topography‐flow interactions. These results suggest that the SST improvement with backscatter is partly due to the resulted strengthening of resolved currents, whereas the role of improved eddy physics requires further research. 

Abstract. We describe an idealized primitive-equation model for studying mesoscale turbulence and leverage a hierarchy of grid resolutions to make eddy-resolving calculations on the finest grids more affordable.The model has intermediate complexity, incorporating basin-scale geometry with idealized Atlantic and Southern oceans and with non-uniform ocean depth to allow for mesoscale eddy interactions with topography.The model is perfectly adiabatic and spans the Equator and thus fills a gap between quasi-geostrophic models, which cannot span two hemispheres, and idealized general circulation models, which generally include diabatic processes and buoyancy forcing.We show that the model solution is approaching convergence in mean kinetic energy for the ocean mesoscale processes of interest and has a rich range of dynamics with circulation features that emerge only due to resolving mesoscale turbulence. 

Abstract There are two distinct parameterizations for the restratification effect of mesoscale eddies: the Greatbatch and Lamb (1990, GL90,https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/phoc/20/10/1520-0485_1990_020_1634_opvmom_2_0_co_2.xml?tab_body=abstract-display) parameterization, which mixes horizontal momentum in the vertical, and the Gent and McWilliams (1990, GM90,https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/phoc/20/1/1520-0485_1990_020_0150_imiocm_2_0_co_2.xml) parameterization, which flattens isopycnals adiabatically. Even though these two parameterizations are effectively equivalent under the assumption of quasi‐geostrophy, GL90 has been used much less than GM90, and exclusively inz‐coordinate models. In this paper, we compare the GL90 and GM90 parameterizations in an idealized isopycnal coordinate model, both from a theoretical and practical perspective. From a theoretical perspective, GL90 is more attractive than GM90 for isopycnal coordinate models because GL90 provides an interpretation that is fully consistent with thickness‐weighted isopycnal averaging, while GM90 cannot be entirely reconciled with any fully isopycnal averaging framework. From a practical perspective, the GL90 and GM90 parameterizations lead to extremely similar energy levels, flow and vertical structure, even though their energetic pathways are very different. The striking resemblance between the GL90 and GM90 simulations persists from non‐eddying through eddy‐permitting resolution. We conclude that GL90 is a promising alternative to GM90 for isopycnal coordinate models, where it is more consistent with theory, computationally more efficient, easier to implement, and numerically more stable. Assessing the applicability of GL90 in realistic global ocean simulations with hybrid coordinate schemes should be a priority for future work.